When I was student way back when, I sort of remember being taught that in order to become law a bill had to pass both the House of Representatives and Senate.
Democrats are using their what I hope to be short lived majority to make things up on the fly. They are posturing to "deem" the Health-Care bill and send it to President Barrack Hussein Obama for signature. The Health-Care bill has a better than good shot of not needing a vote by the House and Senate to pass. What a great Democracy?
The Founders have to be rolling over in their graves. Comrade Nancy Pelosi doesn't give a hoot for her fellow Democratic colleagues who oppose this legislation. It's get it Done and if you happen to be here after the November mid-term elections, so be it. The bill will be passed and most difficult to overrule.
Democrats are using their what I hope to be short lived majority to make things up on the fly. They are posturing to "deem" the Health-Care bill and send it to President Barrack Hussein Obama for signature. The Health-Care bill has a better than good shot of not needing a vote by the House and Senate to pass. What a great Democracy?
The Founders have to be rolling over in their graves. Comrade Nancy Pelosi doesn't give a hoot for her fellow Democratic colleagues who oppose this legislation. It's get it Done and if you happen to be here after the November mid-term elections, so be it. The bill will be passed and most difficult to overrule.
Wouldn't it be nice to see Nasty Nancy face a legitimate challenge for her seat and see her squirm. Surely not in wacky San Francisco.
3 comments:
The real issue isn't the bill. Let's face it, we need health care reform. The issue is the process .. and the Republicans are as guilty as the Dems.
Sure it is...they need (Dem & Rep)to start over with real reform with everything on the table and not add to the confusion. If they bent over to pick up any of the health care waste we could lower health care costs and easily afford to cover everyone, including the illegal aliens.
Here's another viewpoint:
Legal scholars disagreed about whether it would be a constitutional way to pass the legislation. Yet even critics said they doubt that the procedure would put the measure at risk of being struck down by the courts.
"I feel pretty confident it is unconstitutional," said Michael W. McConnell, director of Stanford Law School's Constitutional Law Center and a former appellate judge appointed by President George W. Bush. "What a court would do about it is a murkier problem."
Post a Comment